top of page
Designers waste hours and days in search of the right image.

Toyou lets users search multiple stock websites at the same time
while adjusting seamlessly and effortlessly to their specific needs.

landing2.png
Overview
OVERVIEW

THE PROBLEM

Stock websites have a reputation for poor image quality, yet they offer an irreplaceable service for the near future. They have a hard job in hand, walking a fine Line between keeping photographers well compensated and users getting a good deal and good images. 

THE GOAL

Find the best way to improve customer satisfaction in the stock photography market.

THE TOOLS

Ux research, data analysis, persona creation, user journy, wireframing and ui design

THE PROCESS

PROCESS-1_edited.png
Stock websites image quality 
could be improved.

Hypothesis . 

MARKET RESEARCH

General

400 Million

Visitors per month

60 +

Websites 

70% Market share

Shutterstock + Getty

Sub categories

Free

Low quality, small 

Database, basic search features and poor ux

Microstock

Low price, large 

Database 

Premium 

Expensive, medium sized database, great quality and resolution

Licenses

Royalty Free

Non-exclusive, unlimited and multiple use of an image 

Rights Managed

Limited, specific and per-use rights to use an image

Editorial 

can only be used to illustrate a news-related story. 

Market Research

VISUAL RESEARCH

MOST WEBSITES LOOK THE SAME AND OFFER THE SAME SOLUTIONS. GOOD UX OR A STAGNANT FILED?

STUDY CASES / UNIQE SITES

typical.png

TYPICAL LOOK AND FEEL

USP, Search bar and lots of images.

500PX.png
ICONS8.png
EVERYPIXEL.png

500PX

ICONS8

EVERYPIXEL

Pros - onboarding first.

Pros - allows users to create their own photos.

Pros - allows users to search multiple sites.

Cons- addresses photographers.

Cons- finished image looks stitched an unreal.

Cons- builds on user prior knowledge.

SURVEY RESULTS
The people have spoken, also, turns out the people are mostly graphic designers.
93 PERCENT.png

studied graphic
design

47 PERCENT.png
17 PERCENT.png
29 PERCENT.png

are pleased with
stock websites

are ok with
them

don’t like
them

usage.png

stock website usage*

*most of the users use more than one website to compliment different needs in terms of quality, availability and pricing.

Visual Research
Survey Results
PERSONA
I decided to focus on creating a better experience for graphic designers.
persona1.png

Dina

31 y/o , art director at a marketing agency.

“The project could be going great and then the client asks for a photo with the same kind of vibe to it but slightly different.”

persona2.png

Michael

27 y/o , freelance graphic designer.

“Sometimes it gets so annoying. all you need is that one photo and they’re all horrible.”

persona3.png

Yarden

27 y/o , freelance graphic designer.

“i don’t get it, most of the people using this sites are creative people, how come they look so old
and outdated.”

Needs

  • a way to share images with stake holders

  • more local genuine faces and scenes

  • more local genuine faces and scenes

Needs

  • faster methods to check photos in context

  • cheaper relatable images

  • an easy way to move between searches

Needs

  • more realistic images

  • a way to separate layers in an image

  • a way to separate layers in an image

Personality

persona bars1.png

Technical skills

persona bars2.png

Pain points

They have to make decisions in a
sea of information based on
intuition.

Stressful / competitive work environment with strict deadlines and budgets.

Motivations

Cares about their work and 

loves / hates the tools they uses.

Aesthetics, minimalism and
cool things.

They have to navigate between
clients and bosses.

Persona
TYPE, SCROLL, TAP, REPEAT

Users search in a scroll down manner, missing filters and features that could help them search faster with better results.

70% used the drop menu

language brier was evident

100% never used the search by image

90% didn’t use any of the advanced filters / didn’t know they existed

DOG-SEARCH.jpg

100% failed to notice the filter chips

Over a video call users (graphic designers and art directors) were asked to conduct two searches, a guided one in search of an image of a female runner and a free search based on past experience.

q: can you quantify how much time it takes you to find an image?

“It can take 70% of a project’s time. Sometimes 2 days until everyone agrees on the image.”

—  Anai, Art director

RESEARCH
CONCLUSION

THE MARKET

Most of the sites look and operate the same way with the difference being image quality and price, This leads users to use more than one website.

OBSERVATIONS

When looking for images users tend to skip features that will improve the search time and results. Users often performed repetitive actions that could be avoided with an onboarding process.

INTERVIEWS

Users complained about quality as in realness, relatability and diversity the most.

INSIGHTIS

Users failed to make the connection between the tool (stock website interface) and how long it takes to find an image.

 

Searching one or two websites limits the scope of the results.

​

​

Research Conclusion
It’s possible to improve users satisfaction over image quality and shorten search time by improving search query.

DEFINING THE SOLUTION

HOW DO YOU GET A USER TO TAKE THE ROAD LESS TRAVELED?

e.g. filters, filter chips and other features besides the search bar.

Initial thoughts circulated around asking users a series of guided questions. but this system is time consuming and could be annoying over time. therefor I turned to focus on improving existing interfaces that people are used to.
 

SKETCH.png
Flow
TRYING OUT DIFFERENT SEARCHES WITH DIFFERENT WEBSITES I FOUND THE FOLLOWING TOOLS TO BE THE MOST HELPFUL.

Implemented into the final design

Flow

A quick onboaring process could help user avoid repetitive actions and yield tailored fitted results for each search.

Onboarding
onboarding .png
Comparing multiple sites

Search results are divided between different sites and presented across the screen according to user onboarding helping the user to make an informed decision.

compere2.png
Filtel Chips

Filter chips offer different interpretations to what you’ve had in mind while bridging the language gap, not only lingually but also between the user and the photographer who uploads the images.

filter chips.png
Layout

Moving the filters and filter chips to the top third of the screen not only places those missed feature in the users path it also frees up space for more images to be displayed.

layout.png
Filters

In-order to get users to use filters, almost half of them are chosen in the onboarding phase. while the ones that could be used to a specific search are right there in the middle.

filters.png
Minimalistic Design

Reducing visual distractions allows users to notice features such as the search by image which is often missed. 

landing2.png
home page.png

Collaborating with stake holders made easy through project pages and saved searches. Making it easier to search multiple images for a project. 

landing2.png
recent.png
Thanks for reading! 

Iftach Gazit

Creative works, portfolio and cv.

© 2020 by IFTACH GAZIT

bottom of page